Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-settings.php on line 520

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-settings.php on line 535

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-settings.php on line 542

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-settings.php on line 578

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-settings.php on line 18

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /www/htdocs/v141437/netbookblog/wp-includes/http.php on line 61
NetBookBlog » EeePC 901

NetBookBlog

13. August 2008

Laufzeit Acer One vs. EeePC 901

Abgelegt unter: Allgemein — Tags:, , — admin @ 14:49

Akku

Ich habe mir nochmal den Testbericht des EeePC 901 mit der sensationell langen Laufzeit angesehen und dort gelesen, dass der Akku 49 Wh an Energie speichern können soll.

Der meinem Acer One beiliegende Akku hat laut Aufdruck 11,1V, 2200mAh (deckt sich mit der ACPI Information die man unter Linux auslesen kann) und 45Wh.

Das hat mich dann doch stutzig gemacht, dass der Asus so viel länger laufen soll. Also nochmal nachgerechnet:

11,1 V * 2200mA * 1 h = 24,42 Wh

Da ist also nur halb soviel drin wie in dem Asus Akku und damit auch eine Erklärung für den Unterschied in der Laufzeit! Um die Energieeffizienz zu vergleichen sollte man also die Laufzeit mit dem von Acer angekündigten 6 Zellen Akku heranziehen.

Der Druckfehler auf dem Acer Akku läßt wohlmöglich darauf schließen, dass man sich noch kurz vor der Veröffentlichung umentschieden hat was die Kapazität des mitgelieferten Akkus angeht.

Robert

Powered by WordPress ( WordPress Deutschland )